(If the Vietnam War’ Wikileaks under the eyes of many South Vietnamese military personnel, John Paul Vann didn’t really live up his legend as Vietnam’s Lawrence of Arabian. This noble-man just understands the Vietnamese more much than the other outsiders for the rest parts, Vann is just a “pain-in-the-ass” cocky, haughty … thank to the power of a top ranking military advisor of Second Military Corps. Purposefully, the U.S was helping the people of South Vietnam repel communist aggression? Mostly false … The heart of U.S Foreign Policy was “the desire to control foreign markets, labors, and resources.)
John Paul Vann, the civilian general of the mountains of the Highlands and the rice deltas of the Central Coast with his staff at II Corps headquarters at Pleiku. To Vann’s left is his chief of staff, Colonel Joseph Pizzi; to Vann’s right is his military deputy, Brigadier General George Wear.
According to axiom-2 (the US had no legitimate reason to be involved in Vietnamese affairs) But how explanation: on January, 2 , 1963, hereby above photo two H-21 and one Huey were shoot down on the battlefield in Mekong Delta. The networks and major newspapers shouldn’t report. It was as if it did not happen? Unquestionably, the struggle for Vietnamese independence was fast becoming an “American-War” raising serious questions about the nature of U.S involvement in Southeast Asia.
UH-1/HUEY IN VIETNAM: VNAF CHOPPERS, THE LEGACY OF VALOR
The Battle of Ap-Bac, the first Huey to operate in Vietnam were medivacs by HU-1As that arrived in April 1962, before the United States became officially involved in the conflict. These UH-1s supported the ARVN troops, but American crews flew them. In October, the first armed Huey/UH-1C, equipped with 2.75-inch rockets and M.30 caliber machine guns, began flying in Vietnam. During the next decade, the Huey was upgraded and modified based on lessons learned in combat: Bell introduced the UH-1D and UH-1H variants. It was in Vietnam-War that Army and Marine soldiers first tested for troop-assault combat training to the new tactics of “Airmobile Warfare”
The Huey became a symbol of the big U.S. training combat forces in Vietnam and millions of people worldwide watched it fly in TV news reports. At its peak in March 1970, the U.S. military operated more than 3,900 helicopters in the war in Vietnam and two thirds of them were Huey. During the course of the war, the UH-1 went through several upgrades. The UH-1A, B, and C models (short fuselage, Bell 204) and the UH-1D and H models (stretched-fuselage, Bell 205) each had improved performance and load-carrying capabilities. The UH-1B and C performed the gunship and some of the transport duties until 1967, when the new AH-1G Cobra arrived on the scene. After years long for US combat troop training, now, finally by the so called Vietnamization stratagem, the Americans started to pull out of the Vietnam War in 1972, the VNAF took over the burden of helicopter troop-transportation. The ARVN soldiers who rode to the battle in VNAF choppers UH-1Hs, suddenly became the ‘VNAF-Cavalier’ In a typical air assault mission, Huey helicopters inserted infantry deep in enemy territory while Huey gun-ships, equipped with machine guns, rockets, and grenade launchers, often escorted the transports. Within minutes, helicopters could insert entire battalions into the heart of enemy territory – this was AIRMOBILITY.
So hereby, I’m introducing in this book a pair of battles in which Ấp-Bắc and Lam Son 719 were unofficial claims for stirring war, un-legitimate reason to bind with U.S involvement.
Purposefully, an urgent meeting hosted by Skull and Bones 40, Mc George Bundy who snatched two Secretaries, Dean Rush and McNamara to Honolulu jointed with Cabot Lodge and General Paul Harkins on November, 20, 1963 (two days prior to great drawback J.F. Kennedy must be assassinated) – assigned McNamara to initiate a fabrication that so called Hanoi’ provocative: “Gulf Tonkin Incident” for retaliation but not war-declaration, then moving US combat troop later in South Vietnam for CIP’ stratagem.
In the early 1961, there were only fifteen thousand Americans in South Vietnam in advisory and support capacities. By then fewer than one hundred Americans had died, these helicopters were shot down in the rice paddies in Mekong Delta at Ap-Bac battle. Helicopter H-21s Work-horse were already ten years old, still the old rickety; that a H-21’s flight crewmember, Mert Perry’s wife Darlene trying tearfully one day to dissuade him from going on a helicopter borne mission saying; They’re only put together with Elmer’s glue.
Vietnam/Iraq Wars, Two different Wars one Destructive parallel
I hope this article as a great explanation of how the Vietnam-War should be conducted in term of counterinsurgency, and how it relates to the dilemma of today's Iraq war. The article also provided a precise, military point of views on the Vietnam-War as a whole that many others had missed. It is worth reading sometimes an unknown author would presents great wisdom about Vietnam-War that many "smart ass" self-proclaimed military-experts in main stream media won't be able to offer. After reading
this article, you will figure out what will happen to the people of Iraq in the coming days. [Just a little note before you read, under the eyes of many ARVN troops, John Paul Vann didn't really live up his legend as Vietnam's Lawrence of Arabia. This guy just understands the Vietnamese more much than the other outsiders. For the rest parts, he is just a "pain-in-the-ass," cocky, haughty....thanks to the power of a top ranking military advisor of Second Military Corps. This little known aspect of the Vietnam War stemming from axiom-1, some venal journalists as Francois Sully, Robert Shaplen, Walter Cronkite …a typical writer in the book about John Paul Vann and the advisory effort, A Bright and Shining Lie, the big lie is what the author, Neil Sheehan, leaves out of the book in which orientated towards the Permanent Government’s axiom-1 [There was never a legitimate non-communist government in Saigon] and also Venerable Thich Nhat Hanh with his book “Lotus on Sea of Fire” New York Time on 24, 25 September 2001 at Cathedral Riverside, New-York, on his lecture “Embracing The Anger” all focus on only seven guerrillas shot up in the air, then U.S bombardment kill 300.000 Kien Hoa residents. It sound damn lie and unbelievable, this small city having lest than 100.000 but he exaggerated with impact-purpose, because at the end of axiom-1 showed-up for worldwide even United Nations members will vote double votes for Viet Cong Flag flapping on Saigon Palace in time Saigon-fall, more than lest of North and South Vietnam flags.
So most of Sheehan’s book deals with the ARVN and the advisory effort up to the Tet Offensive in 1968, and very little if any detail or mention is given to the many years afterward where the Regional Forces and Popular Forces gave quite a good accounting of themselves against the enemy. Sheehan spends the first 700 pages of his book detailing how bad the ARVN was up to the end of 1967 (parts of which are true and the rest was full of lies and prevarications) then spends several pages on the Tet Offensive in early 1968, in which he fails to emphasize that the main fighting units of the Viet Cong army including their commanders and militia-cadres were eliminated, never again to become a viable fighting force. Some interpret this sound defeat of the Viet Cong as a deliberate attempt by the Hanoi Leaders to eliminate their comrades in the south for strengthened North-Communist power. Based on an essentially political media-movement, the Permanent Government would like these venial-journalists had showed-up the Hanoi loose the tactic but won the strategic for the Axis of Evil scheme. Sheehan then skips five years of the war together with Walter Cronkite effort where the Regional Forces/Popular Forces held their own against the NVA and Viet Cong and defeated them in most of the smaller unnamed battles of the war at the village level with sheer Garant M-1 against automatic AK-47
Harriman’s Highway must be untouchable! Then he picks up again with the 1972 Easter Offensive where Vann was killed, not by enemy contact, but by a helicopter crash during the monsoon rains. I did hear a vague rumor that newsmen leaving, however, as a spy pilot on view of bird, I meditated: “Rumor has it … that he was murdered?” … how can’t explanatory notes at the Kontum City still OK, no once enemy occupied while 3 NVA divisions and 1 Tank Regiment 203rd of Front B-3 couldn’t easier overrun this paralyzed city? And just merely RP and PF in defend their city? Unbelievable … right! Or due to John Paul Vann’s took priority all B-52s concentrated support [reserved of another Corps] in secured protection this little Kontum City which was preplanned of Axis of Evil for Viet Cong anticipated-Capital in the next year for predominantly in 1973 Paris Peace Talk? Barely 30 pages of Sheehan’s book are devoted to Vann’s success with Vietnamization strategy [so why Sheehan’s book got the prize from who proposed? And Walter Cronkite became notorious-expert for prevarication] -As for last year 1971 General named Vietnamese Patton Trí was killed by his helicopter crashed right after airborne, all were get killed included innocent journalist Francois Sully; the rumor leaving, due to his17,000 dared-soldiers destroying all cargo-ammunitions on COSVN, Viet Cong Headquarters where were unloaded by thousand trucks moved supplies from Sihanoukvill-Seaport, then now Lon Nol PM took over, and changed the name Kompong Som-Seaport; so there is just only exit Harriman’s highway for supplies to his NVA’ enemy-buddies go through this corridor in performance axiom-1. - Whereas northern Harriman’s Highway, both SOG, the USAF, and our helicopter H-34s had suspected as much with USAF intelligence determining Oscar Eight contained the largest depot outside North Vietnam. Sergeant John Meyer who ran recon near Oscar Eight, recalled, “The area was really hot. I mean, every team that went in there got the shit shot out of it”. Just before the 1968 raid, U.S signal intelligence each day detected 2,300 radio messages emanating from there to North VN, a volume unparalleled throughout Laos. General Westmoreland believed a certain NVA General [Vo Bam] Field Army headquarters that controlled all enemy operations in South Vietnam’s 1 Corps was located there. Immediately, General Westmorland would plan-opening operation at Oscar-Eight for identifying the size of NVA military building … At once, Westmoreland has to go home with the assigned post Joint Chief of Staff – Was General Westmoreland been fired?
Oscar Eight’s terrain favored the enemy, with the only suitable LZ in a wide bowl, surrounded by jungle high ground containing antiaircraft missiles and bunkered infantry. Too many tactical fighters were shot down included EC-130B at there. The raid began with a dawn Arc Light by nine B.52s. Flying Covey, Master Sergeant Billy Waugh watched nearly a thousand 500 and 750-pound bombs walk across Oscar Eight, setting off 50 secondary explosions. Incredibly, the bombs had barely stopped falling when he could see NVA running from their shelters to roll fuel barrels away from a fire. Waugh radioed SOG Lieutenant Colonel Harold Rose at Khe-Sanh, “I’ve got people out here scurrying around. That sonvabitch is loaded” As the smoke cleared… So in sum, we must say: if you don’t want get trouble … just don’t touch the Harriman’s Highway.
There was hardly mention of RF/PF, the home militias, the little guys in tennis shoes whose inflicted over one-third of the casualties the enemy. Taking the fight to the VC at the hamlet and village level, not all the RF/PF were great soldiers, but many of them were if properly led, just as Vann had told us at advisor school. They were not configured to stand up against a large force of NVA regulars, but they could provide security for the locals in a hamlet or village. The Soldiers either had their families living with them, or in the nearby village. Who better to know when the enemy was coming into a village than those who lived there? There were many times when they knew when the Vietcong were coming into the village at night to recruit or create havoc. And then instead of being ambushed, just a little band of PF’ fighters became the ambusher. They beat the guerrillas at their own game. They took the night away from them. They no longer patrolled endlessly and aimlessly looking for a needle in a haystack, waiting for the NVA troop to initiate contact. They waited for them in the darkness of the night, and kicked hell out of them. In today's military vernacular, we preempted them. That’s how you fight the guerrilla and the terrorist and beat him at his own game. We cringe now watching news clips on TV as young American Soldiers in Iraq are ambushed by snipers and blown up with the new version of the command controlled booby trap, the IED (Improvised Explosive Device) but how would the young American Soldiers be able to distinguish the al-Qaida terrorist from a local Iraqi civilization? The simple answer is, they can’t.
And how do they find the IED? The answer is they can’t unless an informer warns beforehand as to the location. We believe the answer to this problem is found in the type of force that Vann created in Vietnam, coordinated by CORDS (Civil Operations for Revolutionary Development Support) So different was this approach to conventional warfare tactics that Vann insisted it be operated under civilian control on equal footing with the military hierarchy. Vann really wanted the U.S. military advisors to be in command of the gung-ho spirit instead of being advisors, but Robert Komer, the first director [comprehensibility dispatched by Permanent- Government] of CORDS, resisted this idea for axiom-1 as well. Vann’s approach to counter- insurgency was the blending of all civilian agencies in Vietnam under CORDS with a loan of 1820 U.S. military personnel to serve as advisors to local Soldiers to provide security for all aspects of the U.S. effort in Vietnam. These were the front line guys who made up the mobile advisory teams, who moved from one RF/PF unit to another accompanying them on day and night time operations. It seemed to me we are always waiting for the enemy to ambush us in Iraq. The first strike is always thrown by the terrorist, and then we react by sometimes killing Iraqi civilians as the sniper fades away into the crowd. This unfortunate response is, in itself, a tactic of the terrorist/insurgent/enemy combatant. Don’t we need to pre-empt the terrorist as he is preparing the IED to blow up an unsuspecting U.S. Soldier and don’t we need to know that a terrorist cell from outside Iraq has begun operating in a neighborhood? To do so, we need intelligence from the local civilians and Soldiers from the area who understand the language, customs, and dynamics of the local situation, who can easily point out strangers in the area even though they speak the same language, but look different. The best of the MAT teams helped perform all of the above missions because they lived with their Vietnamese counterparts 24 hours a day, ate their food, got to know their families and developed friendships that last even Today, more than three decades after the war. The meaning of “Advisors” did not retreat back to a secure base camp far removed from the people they were trying to help and defend. So where do we get the local Soldiers in Iraq to perform this mission? As a former Advisor, We sat in astonishment when we saw the 500,000 man Iraqi Army being disbanded and sent home immediately after Saddam’s main army collapsed that repeated blows of Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge after Diem’s assassination 1963, he did eliminated all counterinsurgency, intelligence forces, Strategy Hamlet Program, Rural revolutionary development … For the most part, they surrendered without firing a shot. Why send home a trained army, although obviously not well trained according to Western standards, but surely part of them could have been used along the guidelines of the MAT team concept in Vietnam? We should realize that all of Saddam’s army could not have been used like we used the RF/PF in Vietnam, but surely some of them could. It was obvious that a large number of Saddam’s conscripted forces were not loyal to him. We could have had local Iraqi soldiers patrolling under the command of small military advisor teams to help flush out enemy combatants and newly arrived in-country al-Qaida terrorists. The advisor teams would provide the coordination and communication with the larger American units in the area. This would enhance security for the civilian efforts and NGOs in Iraq. The Iraqi civilians must feel safe and secure before a new form of government can develop without the imprint of a terrorist stamp.
We had to believe that what Vann said in the 1960s in Vietnam, is relevant today in Iraq as it relates to counterinsurgency. All the high tech gadgetry and firepower that our military has today, leaves us relatively helpless when it comes to fighting the insurgent who blends in with the civilian population. An innocent civilian killed translates into a win for the terrorist. To avoid this, it takes the Soldier on the ground with a rifle taking the fight to the terrorist, in an area that he previously thought was a safe sanctuary. And to do that, you need local Soldiers familiar with the terrain, the language and the customs of the area. John Paul Vann understood that. The Vietnam-War has been misremembered, misunderstood, and misreported in regard to John Paul Vann’s effort with Vietnamization and the fighting ability of the South Vietnamese Soldier. Sheehan has done them a great disservice in his book, A Bright-And-Shining Lie, it seemed to me from which a movie of like title was made as same in Vietnam “Chúng Tôi Muốn Sống” [We want alive] in Vietnam 1955 right for prewar Second Indochinese Wars 1954-1975; the Permanent Government invested some dollar to hire movie-technicians from Philippines for assistance this film purposely as well.
(Continued)
John Paul Vann, the civilian general of the mountains of the Highlands and the rice deltas of the Central Coast with his staff at II Corps headquarters at Pleiku. To Vann’s left is his chief of staff, Colonel Joseph Pizzi; to Vann’s right is his military deputy, Brigadier General George Wear.
According to axiom-2 (the US had no legitimate reason to be involved in Vietnamese affairs) But how explanation: on January, 2 , 1963, hereby above photo two H-21 and one Huey were shoot down on the battlefield in Mekong Delta. The networks and major newspapers shouldn’t report. It was as if it did not happen? Unquestionably, the struggle for Vietnamese independence was fast becoming an “American-War” raising serious questions about the nature of U.S involvement in Southeast Asia.
UH-1/HUEY IN VIETNAM: VNAF CHOPPERS, THE LEGACY OF VALOR
The Battle of Ap-Bac, the first Huey to operate in Vietnam were medivacs by HU-1As that arrived in April 1962, before the United States became officially involved in the conflict. These UH-1s supported the ARVN troops, but American crews flew them. In October, the first armed Huey/UH-1C, equipped with 2.75-inch rockets and M.30 caliber machine guns, began flying in Vietnam. During the next decade, the Huey was upgraded and modified based on lessons learned in combat: Bell introduced the UH-1D and UH-1H variants. It was in Vietnam-War that Army and Marine soldiers first tested for troop-assault combat training to the new tactics of “Airmobile Warfare”
The Huey became a symbol of the big U.S. training combat forces in Vietnam and millions of people worldwide watched it fly in TV news reports. At its peak in March 1970, the U.S. military operated more than 3,900 helicopters in the war in Vietnam and two thirds of them were Huey. During the course of the war, the UH-1 went through several upgrades. The UH-1A, B, and C models (short fuselage, Bell 204) and the UH-1D and H models (stretched-fuselage, Bell 205) each had improved performance and load-carrying capabilities. The UH-1B and C performed the gunship and some of the transport duties until 1967, when the new AH-1G Cobra arrived on the scene. After years long for US combat troop training, now, finally by the so called Vietnamization stratagem, the Americans started to pull out of the Vietnam War in 1972, the VNAF took over the burden of helicopter troop-transportation. The ARVN soldiers who rode to the battle in VNAF choppers UH-1Hs, suddenly became the ‘VNAF-Cavalier’ In a typical air assault mission, Huey helicopters inserted infantry deep in enemy territory while Huey gun-ships, equipped with machine guns, rockets, and grenade launchers, often escorted the transports. Within minutes, helicopters could insert entire battalions into the heart of enemy territory – this was AIRMOBILITY.
So hereby, I’m introducing in this book a pair of battles in which Ấp-Bắc and Lam Son 719 were unofficial claims for stirring war, un-legitimate reason to bind with U.S involvement.
Purposefully, an urgent meeting hosted by Skull and Bones 40, Mc George Bundy who snatched two Secretaries, Dean Rush and McNamara to Honolulu jointed with Cabot Lodge and General Paul Harkins on November, 20, 1963 (two days prior to great drawback J.F. Kennedy must be assassinated) – assigned McNamara to initiate a fabrication that so called Hanoi’ provocative: “Gulf Tonkin Incident” for retaliation but not war-declaration, then moving US combat troop later in South Vietnam for CIP’ stratagem.
In the early 1961, there were only fifteen thousand Americans in South Vietnam in advisory and support capacities. By then fewer than one hundred Americans had died, these helicopters were shot down in the rice paddies in Mekong Delta at Ap-Bac battle. Helicopter H-21s Work-horse were already ten years old, still the old rickety; that a H-21’s flight crewmember, Mert Perry’s wife Darlene trying tearfully one day to dissuade him from going on a helicopter borne mission saying; They’re only put together with Elmer’s glue.
Vietnam/Iraq Wars, Two different Wars one Destructive parallel
I hope this article as a great explanation of how the Vietnam-War should be conducted in term of counterinsurgency, and how it relates to the dilemma of today's Iraq war. The article also provided a precise, military point of views on the Vietnam-War as a whole that many others had missed. It is worth reading sometimes an unknown author would presents great wisdom about Vietnam-War that many "smart ass" self-proclaimed military-experts in main stream media won't be able to offer. After reading
this article, you will figure out what will happen to the people of Iraq in the coming days. [Just a little note before you read, under the eyes of many ARVN troops, John Paul Vann didn't really live up his legend as Vietnam's Lawrence of Arabia. This guy just understands the Vietnamese more much than the other outsiders. For the rest parts, he is just a "pain-in-the-ass," cocky, haughty....thanks to the power of a top ranking military advisor of Second Military Corps. This little known aspect of the Vietnam War stemming from axiom-1, some venal journalists as Francois Sully, Robert Shaplen, Walter Cronkite …a typical writer in the book about John Paul Vann and the advisory effort, A Bright and Shining Lie, the big lie is what the author, Neil Sheehan, leaves out of the book in which orientated towards the Permanent Government’s axiom-1 [There was never a legitimate non-communist government in Saigon] and also Venerable Thich Nhat Hanh with his book “Lotus on Sea of Fire” New York Time on 24, 25 September 2001 at Cathedral Riverside, New-York, on his lecture “Embracing The Anger” all focus on only seven guerrillas shot up in the air, then U.S bombardment kill 300.000 Kien Hoa residents. It sound damn lie and unbelievable, this small city having lest than 100.000 but he exaggerated with impact-purpose, because at the end of axiom-1 showed-up for worldwide even United Nations members will vote double votes for Viet Cong Flag flapping on Saigon Palace in time Saigon-fall, more than lest of North and South Vietnam flags.
So most of Sheehan’s book deals with the ARVN and the advisory effort up to the Tet Offensive in 1968, and very little if any detail or mention is given to the many years afterward where the Regional Forces and Popular Forces gave quite a good accounting of themselves against the enemy. Sheehan spends the first 700 pages of his book detailing how bad the ARVN was up to the end of 1967 (parts of which are true and the rest was full of lies and prevarications) then spends several pages on the Tet Offensive in early 1968, in which he fails to emphasize that the main fighting units of the Viet Cong army including their commanders and militia-cadres were eliminated, never again to become a viable fighting force. Some interpret this sound defeat of the Viet Cong as a deliberate attempt by the Hanoi Leaders to eliminate their comrades in the south for strengthened North-Communist power. Based on an essentially political media-movement, the Permanent Government would like these venial-journalists had showed-up the Hanoi loose the tactic but won the strategic for the Axis of Evil scheme. Sheehan then skips five years of the war together with Walter Cronkite effort where the Regional Forces/Popular Forces held their own against the NVA and Viet Cong and defeated them in most of the smaller unnamed battles of the war at the village level with sheer Garant M-1 against automatic AK-47
Harriman’s Highway must be untouchable! Then he picks up again with the 1972 Easter Offensive where Vann was killed, not by enemy contact, but by a helicopter crash during the monsoon rains. I did hear a vague rumor that newsmen leaving, however, as a spy pilot on view of bird, I meditated: “Rumor has it … that he was murdered?” … how can’t explanatory notes at the Kontum City still OK, no once enemy occupied while 3 NVA divisions and 1 Tank Regiment 203rd of Front B-3 couldn’t easier overrun this paralyzed city? And just merely RP and PF in defend their city? Unbelievable … right! Or due to John Paul Vann’s took priority all B-52s concentrated support [reserved of another Corps] in secured protection this little Kontum City which was preplanned of Axis of Evil for Viet Cong anticipated-Capital in the next year for predominantly in 1973 Paris Peace Talk? Barely 30 pages of Sheehan’s book are devoted to Vann’s success with Vietnamization strategy [so why Sheehan’s book got the prize from who proposed? And Walter Cronkite became notorious-expert for prevarication] -As for last year 1971 General named Vietnamese Patton Trí was killed by his helicopter crashed right after airborne, all were get killed included innocent journalist Francois Sully; the rumor leaving, due to his17,000 dared-soldiers destroying all cargo-ammunitions on COSVN, Viet Cong Headquarters where were unloaded by thousand trucks moved supplies from Sihanoukvill-Seaport, then now Lon Nol PM took over, and changed the name Kompong Som-Seaport; so there is just only exit Harriman’s highway for supplies to his NVA’ enemy-buddies go through this corridor in performance axiom-1. - Whereas northern Harriman’s Highway, both SOG, the USAF, and our helicopter H-34s had suspected as much with USAF intelligence determining Oscar Eight contained the largest depot outside North Vietnam. Sergeant John Meyer who ran recon near Oscar Eight, recalled, “The area was really hot. I mean, every team that went in there got the shit shot out of it”. Just before the 1968 raid, U.S signal intelligence each day detected 2,300 radio messages emanating from there to North VN, a volume unparalleled throughout Laos. General Westmoreland believed a certain NVA General [Vo Bam] Field Army headquarters that controlled all enemy operations in South Vietnam’s 1 Corps was located there. Immediately, General Westmorland would plan-opening operation at Oscar-Eight for identifying the size of NVA military building … At once, Westmoreland has to go home with the assigned post Joint Chief of Staff – Was General Westmoreland been fired?
Oscar Eight’s terrain favored the enemy, with the only suitable LZ in a wide bowl, surrounded by jungle high ground containing antiaircraft missiles and bunkered infantry. Too many tactical fighters were shot down included EC-130B at there. The raid began with a dawn Arc Light by nine B.52s. Flying Covey, Master Sergeant Billy Waugh watched nearly a thousand 500 and 750-pound bombs walk across Oscar Eight, setting off 50 secondary explosions. Incredibly, the bombs had barely stopped falling when he could see NVA running from their shelters to roll fuel barrels away from a fire. Waugh radioed SOG Lieutenant Colonel Harold Rose at Khe-Sanh, “I’ve got people out here scurrying around. That sonvabitch is loaded” As the smoke cleared… So in sum, we must say: if you don’t want get trouble … just don’t touch the Harriman’s Highway.
There was hardly mention of RF/PF, the home militias, the little guys in tennis shoes whose inflicted over one-third of the casualties the enemy. Taking the fight to the VC at the hamlet and village level, not all the RF/PF were great soldiers, but many of them were if properly led, just as Vann had told us at advisor school. They were not configured to stand up against a large force of NVA regulars, but they could provide security for the locals in a hamlet or village. The Soldiers either had their families living with them, or in the nearby village. Who better to know when the enemy was coming into a village than those who lived there? There were many times when they knew when the Vietcong were coming into the village at night to recruit or create havoc. And then instead of being ambushed, just a little band of PF’ fighters became the ambusher. They beat the guerrillas at their own game. They took the night away from them. They no longer patrolled endlessly and aimlessly looking for a needle in a haystack, waiting for the NVA troop to initiate contact. They waited for them in the darkness of the night, and kicked hell out of them. In today's military vernacular, we preempted them. That’s how you fight the guerrilla and the terrorist and beat him at his own game. We cringe now watching news clips on TV as young American Soldiers in Iraq are ambushed by snipers and blown up with the new version of the command controlled booby trap, the IED (Improvised Explosive Device) but how would the young American Soldiers be able to distinguish the al-Qaida terrorist from a local Iraqi civilization? The simple answer is, they can’t.
And how do they find the IED? The answer is they can’t unless an informer warns beforehand as to the location. We believe the answer to this problem is found in the type of force that Vann created in Vietnam, coordinated by CORDS (Civil Operations for Revolutionary Development Support) So different was this approach to conventional warfare tactics that Vann insisted it be operated under civilian control on equal footing with the military hierarchy. Vann really wanted the U.S. military advisors to be in command of the gung-ho spirit instead of being advisors, but Robert Komer, the first director [comprehensibility dispatched by Permanent- Government] of CORDS, resisted this idea for axiom-1 as well. Vann’s approach to counter- insurgency was the blending of all civilian agencies in Vietnam under CORDS with a loan of 1820 U.S. military personnel to serve as advisors to local Soldiers to provide security for all aspects of the U.S. effort in Vietnam. These were the front line guys who made up the mobile advisory teams, who moved from one RF/PF unit to another accompanying them on day and night time operations. It seemed to me we are always waiting for the enemy to ambush us in Iraq. The first strike is always thrown by the terrorist, and then we react by sometimes killing Iraqi civilians as the sniper fades away into the crowd. This unfortunate response is, in itself, a tactic of the terrorist/insurgent/enemy combatant. Don’t we need to pre-empt the terrorist as he is preparing the IED to blow up an unsuspecting U.S. Soldier and don’t we need to know that a terrorist cell from outside Iraq has begun operating in a neighborhood? To do so, we need intelligence from the local civilians and Soldiers from the area who understand the language, customs, and dynamics of the local situation, who can easily point out strangers in the area even though they speak the same language, but look different. The best of the MAT teams helped perform all of the above missions because they lived with their Vietnamese counterparts 24 hours a day, ate their food, got to know their families and developed friendships that last even Today, more than three decades after the war. The meaning of “Advisors” did not retreat back to a secure base camp far removed from the people they were trying to help and defend. So where do we get the local Soldiers in Iraq to perform this mission? As a former Advisor, We sat in astonishment when we saw the 500,000 man Iraqi Army being disbanded and sent home immediately after Saddam’s main army collapsed that repeated blows of Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge after Diem’s assassination 1963, he did eliminated all counterinsurgency, intelligence forces, Strategy Hamlet Program, Rural revolutionary development … For the most part, they surrendered without firing a shot. Why send home a trained army, although obviously not well trained according to Western standards, but surely part of them could have been used along the guidelines of the MAT team concept in Vietnam? We should realize that all of Saddam’s army could not have been used like we used the RF/PF in Vietnam, but surely some of them could. It was obvious that a large number of Saddam’s conscripted forces were not loyal to him. We could have had local Iraqi soldiers patrolling under the command of small military advisor teams to help flush out enemy combatants and newly arrived in-country al-Qaida terrorists. The advisor teams would provide the coordination and communication with the larger American units in the area. This would enhance security for the civilian efforts and NGOs in Iraq. The Iraqi civilians must feel safe and secure before a new form of government can develop without the imprint of a terrorist stamp.
We had to believe that what Vann said in the 1960s in Vietnam, is relevant today in Iraq as it relates to counterinsurgency. All the high tech gadgetry and firepower that our military has today, leaves us relatively helpless when it comes to fighting the insurgent who blends in with the civilian population. An innocent civilian killed translates into a win for the terrorist. To avoid this, it takes the Soldier on the ground with a rifle taking the fight to the terrorist, in an area that he previously thought was a safe sanctuary. And to do that, you need local Soldiers familiar with the terrain, the language and the customs of the area. John Paul Vann understood that. The Vietnam-War has been misremembered, misunderstood, and misreported in regard to John Paul Vann’s effort with Vietnamization and the fighting ability of the South Vietnamese Soldier. Sheehan has done them a great disservice in his book, A Bright-And-Shining Lie, it seemed to me from which a movie of like title was made as same in Vietnam “Chúng Tôi Muốn Sống” [We want alive] in Vietnam 1955 right for prewar Second Indochinese Wars 1954-1975; the Permanent Government invested some dollar to hire movie-technicians from Philippines for assistance this film purposely as well.
(Continued)

Comment