vinhtruong
10-24-2010, 06:16 PM
(Why I dare say W A Harriman' Emperor-1, George-1 Emperor-2)
Truth is often stranger than fiction. A reasonable supposition is one which appeals to our common sense; I called a rational power for a rational analysis: intelligent, judicious, wise, and equitable, conditionally I evidenced my approval by putting thing to be testified proof
Pope John Paul II, in his diary "Memory and Identity", told us much about social history, but the important of his statement is "communism: a necessary evil". In fact he saw Communist fall apart in 1991 but how about Skull and Bones? In haven he knew when it will happening but we don't. One said: We have a Nuremberg trial for the Nazis, but still no Nuremberg trial for Communism? It seemed to me, evidently due to no official formulated declaration war between them. This Axis of Evil was shrewd enough as political-scam by the Cold-War Game, so no reasonable trial reserved for them at all. Naturally, this coalition will not find a safe haven here: Evil will not last! JF Kennedy administration knew how their 'common cause', trying to eradicate these WIB-Bones out, but sometimes brings them closer together, cementing a new partnership at their expensive between debtor and creditor.
In the past, W A. Harriman had evolved his own version of "permanent government" akin to British model. Although this power establishment peaked since the 1920 "Eurasian Great Game" through the 21st century in influence lingered to Prince George-II' critical advantage.- spiritual progenitor of the Bush clan made money and connection in WW-1. Afterward, they were wooded in 1919 by W A. Harriman to run an ambitious set of investments about to be cobbled together in the postwar political maelstrom of 1920s Germany and Russia. Over few decades, father in law Walker helped steer Prescott Bush to the top of what became the Brown Brothers Harriman of mid-century, full of Yale Skull and Bones-men London-linked, rich, politically influential, and intimately wired through several of its top partners to the postwar birthing of the CIA.
W A Harriman (1891-1986) and his new colleague George H Walker (1875-1953) would supply Hamburg-Amerika with ships if it would act as the European agent for Harriman's own shipping lines (St Louis newspapers described Walker in awed terms as the man responsible for assembling Harriman's Overseas Empire) As a holding company for buying into Hamburg-Amerika, Harriman and Walker both took turn became directors. The grander framework for Harriman's overall domestic and international business ambitions, organized in 1919, was W A Harriman and Company, which immediately garnered additional influential sponsorship. Coincidence is an unlikely explanation of either the Harriman's firm's global ambition or its 1920s dominance by Skull and Bones-men. W A. Harriman and Roland Harriman had seen their father build a financial empire in railroads. Now they wanted to use that capital to build an even larger empire of their own.
Matthew Brush, president of the American International Corporation from 1923 to 1933, had his closest connection with W A. Harriman and George H Walker during the years when Harriman and Walker were getting involved in Soviet off and manganese operations, and then trying to secure the maximum return and successful withdrawal of capital from Soviet Union. This Triumvirate had a taste for foreign intrigue. In 1923 and 1924, when Wall Street was focused on assessing and arranging German American investment bank owned by AIC, that before 1917 had been an asset of German intelligence.
W A Harriman showed up to public life as freewheeling-diplomat: In the 1930 W A Harriman served President Franklin Roosevelt in various capacities with the National Recovery Administration, the Business Advisory Council of the department of commerce and the Office of Production Management, in the later capacity, Harriman was chief of the raw materials branch and as Roosevelt a special envoy coordinated lend-lease aid to British and the Russia from 1941 to 1943, "To keep the British isles afloat" instructing him to report directly to the White-House, thus bypassing the American Ambassador and the State Department. He acted on this personal level for several years, attending all of the war time conferences and twice going on mission to arrangement increased aid to the Soviet Union. In 1943 Roosevelt appointed him U.S ambassador to Moscow. Harriman served President Harry S Truman in turn as secretary of commerce (1946-1948) director of economic aid to Europe under the Marshall Plan (1948-1950) and US representative on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) commission studying Western defenses in 1951. When the Korea War began in June 1950, Harriman arranged his early return from Europe with a phone call to US President informing to Truman that Europeans were gravely concerned lest we fail to meet the challenge in Europe. Harriman took up residence in the Executive Office Building a blow to his ego because he fully expected to be at President's side as a special assistant to Truman for national security affairs and with his own talent staff.
His demonstration authorized to administrative cabinet about human resources as that General McArthur be fired immediately by unauthorized policy statements, appointed Supreme Commander of NATO General Dwight D Eisenhower instead must be General George Patton; Harriman reported to Truman Johnson's effort to enlist his assistance to secure Acheson's dismissal, Harriman greatly admired Johnson's successor, General of the Army George C Marshall. Harriman was the author of the presidential order aimed at curbing McArthur's public criticism of the Truman administration's war policies by requiring all policies statements to be approved in advance by the administration ...
As for young George H W Bush will take over as acted manager Emperor-II job when W A. Harriman will be a retiree as a masterminded transitional Permanent Government. George-1 was apprenticed to Harriman at the start 1960 to 1969 merely his surrogate overlapped transaction focus on "Counter-Insurgency-Plan" However, George-1 was a greatest kid in school, Navy combat pilot at twenty, son of a US senator who had headed a major Wall Street investment bank. Thereby, his Vietnam-War and Watergate had changed the nation's political and cultural yardsticks. (The up elevator of the old establishment, of the World War-II, "Wise Men" and the newer "Best and Brightest" of the Kennedy era had lost much of its power. So what coincidence over the decades the Bushes had prided themselves on being the unKennedys. They considered the Kennedys as competitors, as Jeb Bush had told one reporter in 1986, "I think we could probably beat the Kennedys in touch football, we could beat them in basketball, baseball, any goddamn sport they want to play"
From Emperor-II standpoint, Texas oilmen presidents have now launched the last three US wars for terminated "World-Strategic-Eurasian" (1) Vietnam of 1965, (2) the Gulf War of 1991 (3) and of 2003 war to overthrow Saddam Hussein: At Vietnam, General Maxwell Taylor trip to Saigon quote: "On the 18th Oct, 1961 President Ngo Dinh Diem said he wanted no US combat troops for any mission!" Use Vietnam as an US laboratory of the CIP, Diem's just boldly chose to dramatize his complaint by delaying agreement on the commitment of South Vietnamese funds for joint Counter Insurgency Plan. This triumvirate: Harriman, son and father Prescott Bush. (In the library JFK: National Security File, meeting on Vietnam October/29/1963) W A Harriman stated: "With the passage of time, our objective in Vietnam will become more and more difficult to achieve with Diem control ... and of course with JFK in the seat of power as well" because both of them don't want US combat troops invaded in South Vietnam. There's not much doubt about it, now we tried to examine the impact of clue that is below as fact-proof testimony:
Mc George Bundy, the White House, on 31/Oct/1963 to Ambassador Cabot Lodge/Vietnam Top secret-eyes only for Ambassador Lodge: [according to JFK]
"We do not accept as a basis for US policy that we have no power to delay or discourage a coup. In our paragraph 12 you say that if you were convinced that the coup was going to fail you would of course do everything you could to stop it. We believe that on this same basis you should take action to persuade coup leaders to stop or delay any operation which, in your best judgment, does not clearly give high prospect of success ..."
- Kennedy assured to the news-reporters that quotes by two lady-historians, Marilyn B Young and Ellen Hammer "We would withdraw the troop, any number of troops, anytime the Government of South Vietnam would suggest it!" Consequently, the storm blew over, the CIP in Vietnam will become more and more difficult to achieve with Kennedy in the seat of power that I must say:
He didn't want send troops far away from home
He don't want to become military involved. He praised the agreement for allowing the United States to avoid military intervention
He would withdraw the troops, any number of troops, any time the GVN would suggest it (President Diem and his brother political adviser, Nhu would like withdraw all U.S. troops as soon as possible)
And the most important is in October, 1963, Kennedy administrative cut off aid to Diem in a Direct rebuff ... and prepare troop withdrawn.
Billion to billion C-Ration for US combat-troop were already produced in 1961 and 1962, (Every can-lid marked month and year for expired date - website, VietnamGear. com)
He don't care about American First stand for War Industries Board's interest
Kennedy told O'Donnell, his White House Aide "So We had better made damned sure that I'm reelected"
Lucius Conein was Henry Cabot Lodge's deputy assistance branch for military in 1963. When President Diem and his political adviser Nhu run away from their Gia-Long' palace, Conein insultingly said in mother-French slang language: "On ne fait pas d'omelette sans casser les oeufs" ["The eggs have been broken ... only one way to fry a meal treat!"] When the hot new reached to White House, President J F Kennedy became shocked, he flied to telephone calling General Maxwell Taylor, asking him as soon as he can, report with more details." Why they did that?"
How can for carrying out the CIP! The WIB Bone ssurrendered their CIP ... be aborted? Again this triumvirate of like-minded leaders in operating the Vietnam war became the real culprits determined destroy two presidents, could indicate some complicity on them part. When W A Harriman passed away in 1986 then CIA history was confirmed: 2005, publishing book "The Secret History of CIA" author Joseph J Trenton noticed in a interview between him and high official CIA, William R Corson disclosed, W A Harriman was just real culprit who gave order to kill two of them: Diem Nhu.
To manage twenty-first century military preparedness and geopolitics, young Coach Emperor-II' of the Permanent Government administration reached back to the final years of the Vietnam War; Thereby Bush's Quarterback, Donald Rumsfeld and Linebacker Richard Cheney, as chief of staff and deputy chief of staff, respectively, had presided over the machinery of the non-elected president Gerald Ford in White House, then the spring of 1975. This cruel April when Saigon finally fell to the NVA troops, followed several weeks later by the mishandling of rescue of the SS Mayaguez, an American merchant ship seized by Cambodia. [Pragmatically, Dick Cheney's and Donald Rumsfeld's involvement in the selection of George H.W Bush as CIA director are among the papers in The Richard Cheney Papers. Of particular interest is Rumsfeld's memo to Gerald Ford on July, 10, 1975, because emperor-II actions verged on obstructing Justice Department investigations. Not least George H W Bush had been insistent in protecting former CIA director Richard Helm, aptly named by his biographer "the man who kept the Secret]
How stirring Vietnam War for a well matched triple: Germany, Korea, and Vietnam?
W A. Harriman' s a Cold-War-Architect: Its is often forgotten that in 1957 the Soviet Union proposed that both of the Vietnamese government then in existence be admitted to the United Nations, not to mention that Communist China much preferred the existence of two Vietnams. Its is clear that, aside from the Vietnamese parties themselves, the participants at the Geneva conference of 1954 all preferred a two-state solution as a way to calm down the potential for global confrontation. The affirmation of a theoretically unified Vietnam in the final declaration of the conference, which was signed by none of the conferees, significantly left the question of the legitimate government of such a unified Vietnam to the vague vicissitudes of an election to be held after two years, which was a diplomat way of painting over national enthusiasm with cold war realism. Why US [War Industries Board on behalf of Skull and Bones] didn't sign on Geneva conference the existence of two Vietnam? And persuaded Soviet Union [debtor] together with U.S [creditor] stirring the Vietnam War by means between CIA and KGB (stemming from book "Aid to Russia 1941-1946" George Herring jr, 1973) Consequently, KGB gave pressure on Hanoi's meeting on April, 1959 at 15th Plenum voted in secret session to return covertly to South Vietnam thousands of such Viet Minh veterans by 559 Group, 759 Group, and 959 Group. [Accordingly first digit meant month and two last digit stand for year] and CIA for instant Operation Lam Son 719 [two first digit stand for year, and last digit meant Route No 9 at South Laos] These significant numbers for easier stored references in U.S and Soviet National Archive documents. By three axiom-standpoints below:
There was never a legitimate non-communist government in Saigon (dissolution)
The US had no legitimate reason to be involved in Vietnamese affairs (Tonkin Gulf Incident)
The US could not have won the war under any circumstances (US troops honorable withdraw)
Knowing the fall of Saigon will happen in the bitter way as cruel April, 1975, George-1 disguised his appearance very cleverly. Barely mention George H W Bush tucked away in China. However, White House chief of staff Donald Rumsfeld drew brief but acid portraiture for first asserting that the fall of Saigon would give President Ford the credit for pulling the Americans out of Vietnam, and then celebrating a triumphant Mayaguez rescue before the ill-managed fighting had actually finished, leaving three US Marines captive on Koh-Tang to be executed by the Cambodians.
For his preparedness taking over from Harriman in the coming year, so on Dec 26, 1967, George-1 paid his own way on a 16 days trip throughout Southeast Asia. He stopped in Honolulu to meet with US military officers and then went on to Tokyo, where he met with Ambassador Donald P Gregg. He proceeded to Saigon, where he held discussions with Ambassador Ellsworth Bunker. He found the meetings informative, but his views about both Vietnam and civil rights crystallized when he went into the field and met with American soldiers. Flying in a Huey helicopter courtesy of the US Army, he traveled to military outpost from the Mekong Delta up to Danang. As he later wrote, "We went out on a new patrol boat and headed up a little inlet to a village and we talked to the people. Six months ago we'd have been zapped by the Viet Cong. There are still VC there but the area is much more peaceful" He also spent time on an American aircraft carrier, talking with pilots about their bombing runs over North Vietnam. The morning he arrived in Danang, mortar shells landed at the base. During one trip to the field his helicopter had to be diverted to avoid heavy ground fire.
Actually, with your concurrence, the rights and wrongs of your thinking: Communism was our enemy but United States was our ally; why President Diem' political adviser said: "... for surrendering the South Vietnam to Communist domination on belief that a deal with kindred peoples was better than submitting to foreign (United States) pressure. (CIA memorandum, no 2352/63 OCI, on 14/9/1963, subject "The possible of a GVN Deal with North Vietnam")
Queenbee-1
Truth is often stranger than fiction. A reasonable supposition is one which appeals to our common sense; I called a rational power for a rational analysis: intelligent, judicious, wise, and equitable, conditionally I evidenced my approval by putting thing to be testified proof
Pope John Paul II, in his diary "Memory and Identity", told us much about social history, but the important of his statement is "communism: a necessary evil". In fact he saw Communist fall apart in 1991 but how about Skull and Bones? In haven he knew when it will happening but we don't. One said: We have a Nuremberg trial for the Nazis, but still no Nuremberg trial for Communism? It seemed to me, evidently due to no official formulated declaration war between them. This Axis of Evil was shrewd enough as political-scam by the Cold-War Game, so no reasonable trial reserved for them at all. Naturally, this coalition will not find a safe haven here: Evil will not last! JF Kennedy administration knew how their 'common cause', trying to eradicate these WIB-Bones out, but sometimes brings them closer together, cementing a new partnership at their expensive between debtor and creditor.
In the past, W A. Harriman had evolved his own version of "permanent government" akin to British model. Although this power establishment peaked since the 1920 "Eurasian Great Game" through the 21st century in influence lingered to Prince George-II' critical advantage.- spiritual progenitor of the Bush clan made money and connection in WW-1. Afterward, they were wooded in 1919 by W A. Harriman to run an ambitious set of investments about to be cobbled together in the postwar political maelstrom of 1920s Germany and Russia. Over few decades, father in law Walker helped steer Prescott Bush to the top of what became the Brown Brothers Harriman of mid-century, full of Yale Skull and Bones-men London-linked, rich, politically influential, and intimately wired through several of its top partners to the postwar birthing of the CIA.
W A Harriman (1891-1986) and his new colleague George H Walker (1875-1953) would supply Hamburg-Amerika with ships if it would act as the European agent for Harriman's own shipping lines (St Louis newspapers described Walker in awed terms as the man responsible for assembling Harriman's Overseas Empire) As a holding company for buying into Hamburg-Amerika, Harriman and Walker both took turn became directors. The grander framework for Harriman's overall domestic and international business ambitions, organized in 1919, was W A Harriman and Company, which immediately garnered additional influential sponsorship. Coincidence is an unlikely explanation of either the Harriman's firm's global ambition or its 1920s dominance by Skull and Bones-men. W A. Harriman and Roland Harriman had seen their father build a financial empire in railroads. Now they wanted to use that capital to build an even larger empire of their own.
Matthew Brush, president of the American International Corporation from 1923 to 1933, had his closest connection with W A. Harriman and George H Walker during the years when Harriman and Walker were getting involved in Soviet off and manganese operations, and then trying to secure the maximum return and successful withdrawal of capital from Soviet Union. This Triumvirate had a taste for foreign intrigue. In 1923 and 1924, when Wall Street was focused on assessing and arranging German American investment bank owned by AIC, that before 1917 had been an asset of German intelligence.
W A Harriman showed up to public life as freewheeling-diplomat: In the 1930 W A Harriman served President Franklin Roosevelt in various capacities with the National Recovery Administration, the Business Advisory Council of the department of commerce and the Office of Production Management, in the later capacity, Harriman was chief of the raw materials branch and as Roosevelt a special envoy coordinated lend-lease aid to British and the Russia from 1941 to 1943, "To keep the British isles afloat" instructing him to report directly to the White-House, thus bypassing the American Ambassador and the State Department. He acted on this personal level for several years, attending all of the war time conferences and twice going on mission to arrangement increased aid to the Soviet Union. In 1943 Roosevelt appointed him U.S ambassador to Moscow. Harriman served President Harry S Truman in turn as secretary of commerce (1946-1948) director of economic aid to Europe under the Marshall Plan (1948-1950) and US representative on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) commission studying Western defenses in 1951. When the Korea War began in June 1950, Harriman arranged his early return from Europe with a phone call to US President informing to Truman that Europeans were gravely concerned lest we fail to meet the challenge in Europe. Harriman took up residence in the Executive Office Building a blow to his ego because he fully expected to be at President's side as a special assistant to Truman for national security affairs and with his own talent staff.
His demonstration authorized to administrative cabinet about human resources as that General McArthur be fired immediately by unauthorized policy statements, appointed Supreme Commander of NATO General Dwight D Eisenhower instead must be General George Patton; Harriman reported to Truman Johnson's effort to enlist his assistance to secure Acheson's dismissal, Harriman greatly admired Johnson's successor, General of the Army George C Marshall. Harriman was the author of the presidential order aimed at curbing McArthur's public criticism of the Truman administration's war policies by requiring all policies statements to be approved in advance by the administration ...
As for young George H W Bush will take over as acted manager Emperor-II job when W A. Harriman will be a retiree as a masterminded transitional Permanent Government. George-1 was apprenticed to Harriman at the start 1960 to 1969 merely his surrogate overlapped transaction focus on "Counter-Insurgency-Plan" However, George-1 was a greatest kid in school, Navy combat pilot at twenty, son of a US senator who had headed a major Wall Street investment bank. Thereby, his Vietnam-War and Watergate had changed the nation's political and cultural yardsticks. (The up elevator of the old establishment, of the World War-II, "Wise Men" and the newer "Best and Brightest" of the Kennedy era had lost much of its power. So what coincidence over the decades the Bushes had prided themselves on being the unKennedys. They considered the Kennedys as competitors, as Jeb Bush had told one reporter in 1986, "I think we could probably beat the Kennedys in touch football, we could beat them in basketball, baseball, any goddamn sport they want to play"
From Emperor-II standpoint, Texas oilmen presidents have now launched the last three US wars for terminated "World-Strategic-Eurasian" (1) Vietnam of 1965, (2) the Gulf War of 1991 (3) and of 2003 war to overthrow Saddam Hussein: At Vietnam, General Maxwell Taylor trip to Saigon quote: "On the 18th Oct, 1961 President Ngo Dinh Diem said he wanted no US combat troops for any mission!" Use Vietnam as an US laboratory of the CIP, Diem's just boldly chose to dramatize his complaint by delaying agreement on the commitment of South Vietnamese funds for joint Counter Insurgency Plan. This triumvirate: Harriman, son and father Prescott Bush. (In the library JFK: National Security File, meeting on Vietnam October/29/1963) W A Harriman stated: "With the passage of time, our objective in Vietnam will become more and more difficult to achieve with Diem control ... and of course with JFK in the seat of power as well" because both of them don't want US combat troops invaded in South Vietnam. There's not much doubt about it, now we tried to examine the impact of clue that is below as fact-proof testimony:
Mc George Bundy, the White House, on 31/Oct/1963 to Ambassador Cabot Lodge/Vietnam Top secret-eyes only for Ambassador Lodge: [according to JFK]
"We do not accept as a basis for US policy that we have no power to delay or discourage a coup. In our paragraph 12 you say that if you were convinced that the coup was going to fail you would of course do everything you could to stop it. We believe that on this same basis you should take action to persuade coup leaders to stop or delay any operation which, in your best judgment, does not clearly give high prospect of success ..."
- Kennedy assured to the news-reporters that quotes by two lady-historians, Marilyn B Young and Ellen Hammer "We would withdraw the troop, any number of troops, anytime the Government of South Vietnam would suggest it!" Consequently, the storm blew over, the CIP in Vietnam will become more and more difficult to achieve with Kennedy in the seat of power that I must say:
He didn't want send troops far away from home
He don't want to become military involved. He praised the agreement for allowing the United States to avoid military intervention
He would withdraw the troops, any number of troops, any time the GVN would suggest it (President Diem and his brother political adviser, Nhu would like withdraw all U.S. troops as soon as possible)
And the most important is in October, 1963, Kennedy administrative cut off aid to Diem in a Direct rebuff ... and prepare troop withdrawn.
Billion to billion C-Ration for US combat-troop were already produced in 1961 and 1962, (Every can-lid marked month and year for expired date - website, VietnamGear. com)
He don't care about American First stand for War Industries Board's interest
Kennedy told O'Donnell, his White House Aide "So We had better made damned sure that I'm reelected"
Lucius Conein was Henry Cabot Lodge's deputy assistance branch for military in 1963. When President Diem and his political adviser Nhu run away from their Gia-Long' palace, Conein insultingly said in mother-French slang language: "On ne fait pas d'omelette sans casser les oeufs" ["The eggs have been broken ... only one way to fry a meal treat!"] When the hot new reached to White House, President J F Kennedy became shocked, he flied to telephone calling General Maxwell Taylor, asking him as soon as he can, report with more details." Why they did that?"
How can for carrying out the CIP! The WIB Bone ssurrendered their CIP ... be aborted? Again this triumvirate of like-minded leaders in operating the Vietnam war became the real culprits determined destroy two presidents, could indicate some complicity on them part. When W A Harriman passed away in 1986 then CIA history was confirmed: 2005, publishing book "The Secret History of CIA" author Joseph J Trenton noticed in a interview between him and high official CIA, William R Corson disclosed, W A Harriman was just real culprit who gave order to kill two of them: Diem Nhu.
To manage twenty-first century military preparedness and geopolitics, young Coach Emperor-II' of the Permanent Government administration reached back to the final years of the Vietnam War; Thereby Bush's Quarterback, Donald Rumsfeld and Linebacker Richard Cheney, as chief of staff and deputy chief of staff, respectively, had presided over the machinery of the non-elected president Gerald Ford in White House, then the spring of 1975. This cruel April when Saigon finally fell to the NVA troops, followed several weeks later by the mishandling of rescue of the SS Mayaguez, an American merchant ship seized by Cambodia. [Pragmatically, Dick Cheney's and Donald Rumsfeld's involvement in the selection of George H.W Bush as CIA director are among the papers in The Richard Cheney Papers. Of particular interest is Rumsfeld's memo to Gerald Ford on July, 10, 1975, because emperor-II actions verged on obstructing Justice Department investigations. Not least George H W Bush had been insistent in protecting former CIA director Richard Helm, aptly named by his biographer "the man who kept the Secret]
How stirring Vietnam War for a well matched triple: Germany, Korea, and Vietnam?
W A. Harriman' s a Cold-War-Architect: Its is often forgotten that in 1957 the Soviet Union proposed that both of the Vietnamese government then in existence be admitted to the United Nations, not to mention that Communist China much preferred the existence of two Vietnams. Its is clear that, aside from the Vietnamese parties themselves, the participants at the Geneva conference of 1954 all preferred a two-state solution as a way to calm down the potential for global confrontation. The affirmation of a theoretically unified Vietnam in the final declaration of the conference, which was signed by none of the conferees, significantly left the question of the legitimate government of such a unified Vietnam to the vague vicissitudes of an election to be held after two years, which was a diplomat way of painting over national enthusiasm with cold war realism. Why US [War Industries Board on behalf of Skull and Bones] didn't sign on Geneva conference the existence of two Vietnam? And persuaded Soviet Union [debtor] together with U.S [creditor] stirring the Vietnam War by means between CIA and KGB (stemming from book "Aid to Russia 1941-1946" George Herring jr, 1973) Consequently, KGB gave pressure on Hanoi's meeting on April, 1959 at 15th Plenum voted in secret session to return covertly to South Vietnam thousands of such Viet Minh veterans by 559 Group, 759 Group, and 959 Group. [Accordingly first digit meant month and two last digit stand for year] and CIA for instant Operation Lam Son 719 [two first digit stand for year, and last digit meant Route No 9 at South Laos] These significant numbers for easier stored references in U.S and Soviet National Archive documents. By three axiom-standpoints below:
There was never a legitimate non-communist government in Saigon (dissolution)
The US had no legitimate reason to be involved in Vietnamese affairs (Tonkin Gulf Incident)
The US could not have won the war under any circumstances (US troops honorable withdraw)
Knowing the fall of Saigon will happen in the bitter way as cruel April, 1975, George-1 disguised his appearance very cleverly. Barely mention George H W Bush tucked away in China. However, White House chief of staff Donald Rumsfeld drew brief but acid portraiture for first asserting that the fall of Saigon would give President Ford the credit for pulling the Americans out of Vietnam, and then celebrating a triumphant Mayaguez rescue before the ill-managed fighting had actually finished, leaving three US Marines captive on Koh-Tang to be executed by the Cambodians.
For his preparedness taking over from Harriman in the coming year, so on Dec 26, 1967, George-1 paid his own way on a 16 days trip throughout Southeast Asia. He stopped in Honolulu to meet with US military officers and then went on to Tokyo, where he met with Ambassador Donald P Gregg. He proceeded to Saigon, where he held discussions with Ambassador Ellsworth Bunker. He found the meetings informative, but his views about both Vietnam and civil rights crystallized when he went into the field and met with American soldiers. Flying in a Huey helicopter courtesy of the US Army, he traveled to military outpost from the Mekong Delta up to Danang. As he later wrote, "We went out on a new patrol boat and headed up a little inlet to a village and we talked to the people. Six months ago we'd have been zapped by the Viet Cong. There are still VC there but the area is much more peaceful" He also spent time on an American aircraft carrier, talking with pilots about their bombing runs over North Vietnam. The morning he arrived in Danang, mortar shells landed at the base. During one trip to the field his helicopter had to be diverted to avoid heavy ground fire.
Actually, with your concurrence, the rights and wrongs of your thinking: Communism was our enemy but United States was our ally; why President Diem' political adviser said: "... for surrendering the South Vietnam to Communist domination on belief that a deal with kindred peoples was better than submitting to foreign (United States) pressure. (CIA memorandum, no 2352/63 OCI, on 14/9/1963, subject "The possible of a GVN Deal with North Vietnam")
Queenbee-1